Wastewater-Based SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Northern New England.

SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA is shed in the stool of 55-70% of infected individuals and can be detected in community wastewater up to 7 days before people present with COVID-19 symptoms. The detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater may serve as a lead indicator of increased community transmission. Here, we monitored viral concentrations in samples collected from nine municipal wastewater facilities in New Hampshire (NH) and Vermont (VT).Twenty-four-h composite primary influent wastewater samples were collected from nine municipal wastewater treatment facilities twice per week for 5 months (late September 2020 to early February 2021). Wastewater was centrifuged for 30 min at 4600 × g, then the supernatant was frozen until further analysis. Once thawed, samples were concentrated, extracted, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcriptase-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) detection methods. Active case counts for each municipality were tracked from the NH and VT state COVID-19 dashboards. We received a total of 283 wastewater samples from all sites during the study period. Viral RNA was detected in 175/283 (61.8%) samples using RT-qPCR and in 195/283 (68.9%) samples using RT-ddPCR. All nine sites showed positivity in the wastewater, with 8/9 (88.8%) sites having over 50% of their samples test positive over the course of the study. Larger municipalities, such as Nashua, Concord, and Lebanon, NH, showed that SARS-CoV-2 positivity in the wastewater can precede spikes in active COVID-19 case counts by as much as 7 days. Smaller municipalities, such as Woodsville, NH and Hartford, VT, showed sporadic SARS-COV-2 detection and did not always precede a rise in active case counts. We detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA in samples from all 9 municipalities tested, including cities and small towns within this region, and showed wastewater positivity as an early indicator of active case count increases in some regions. Some of the smaller rural municipalities with low case counts may require more frequent sampling to detect SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater before a case surge. With timely collection and analysis of wastewater samples, a community could potentially respond to results by increasing public health initiatives, such as tightening mask mandates and banning large indoor gatherings, to mitigate community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. IMPORTANCE Despite vaccination efforts, the delta and omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 have caused global surges of COVID-19. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, it is important to find new ways of tracking early signs of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. The manuscript outlines how to collect wastewater from treatment facilities, concentrate the virus in a dilute wastewater sample, and detect it using two sensitive PCR-based methods. It also describes important trends in SARS-CoV-2 concentration in wastewater of a rural region of the United States from Fall 2020 - Winter 2021 and demonstrates the utility of wastewater monitoring as a leading indicator of active SARS-CoV-2 cases. Monitoring changes in concentration of SARS-CoV-2 virus in wastewater may offer an early indicator of increased case counts and enable appropriate public health actions to be taken.

Comparison of Symptoms and Antibody Response Following Administration of Moderna or Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines.

CONTEXT.­: Moderna (mRNA-1272) and Pfizer (BNT162b2) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines demonstrate favorable safety and efficacy profiles, but direct comparison data are lacking. OBJECTIVE.­: To determine the vaccines' side effect profiles and expected antibody responses. These data may help personalize vaccine selection and identify individuals with a suboptimal vaccine response. DESIGN.­: One hundred forty-nine healthy, largely seronegative adults were assigned Moderna (n = 79) or Pfizer (n = 70). Following the second dose, participants completed a survey documenting their side effects. Serum was collected 0 to 4 days prior to dose 2, and 14 ± 4 days, 30 ± 4 days, 90 ± 10 days, and 180 ± 20 days after dose 2. Convalescent serum specimens were collected 32 to 54 days from donors after a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 20). Anti-spike antibodies were measured using the Roche Diagnostics Elecys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay on a Roche cobas e801 instrument. RESULTS.­: Participants receiving the Moderna vaccine experienced side effects with greater frequency and severity. Both vaccines elicited a robust antibody response, but median signal was higher in Moderna recipients. Symptom severity decreased with age. Antibody response in Pfizer recipients negatively correlated with age. Antibody response decreased after 6 months (84% reduction in Moderna, 79% Pfizer), but values remained greater than for convalescent donors. Antibody response did not correlate with gender or symptom severity. CONCLUSIONS.­: Moderna may be preferred in individuals in need of greater immune stimulation (eg, older individuals), whereas Pfizer may be preferred in those concerned about vaccine reactions. Anti-spike antibody signal varies by vaccine, so specific reference intervals will be needed to identify individuals with a suboptimal response.

Longitudinal Systemic and Mucosal Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

BACKGROUND: A longitudinal study was performed to determine the breadth, kinetics, and correlations of systemic and mucosal antibody responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. METHODS: Twenty-six unvaccinated adults with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were followed for 6 months with 3 collections of blood, nasal secretions, and stool. Control samples were obtained from 16 unvaccinated uninfected individuals. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing and binding antibody responses were respectively evaluated by pseudovirus assays and multiplex bead arrays. RESULTS: Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 were detected in serum and respiratory samples for 96% (25/26) and 54% (14/26), respectively, of infected participants. Robust binding antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and S1, S2, and receptor binding (RBD) domains occurred in serum and respiratory nasal secretions, but not in stool samples. Serum neutralization correlated with RBD-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgM, and IgA in serum (Spearman ρ = 0.74, 0.66, and 0.57, respectively), RBD-specific IgG in respiratory secretions (ρ = 0.52), disease severity (ρ = 0.59), and age (ρ = 0.40). Respiratory mucosal neutralization correlated with RBD-specific IgM (ρ = 0.42) and IgA (ρ = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Sustained antibody responses occurred after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Notably, there was independent induction of IgM and IgA binding antibody and neutralizing responses in systemic and respiratory compartments. These observations have implications for current vaccine strategies and understanding SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and transmission.

A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays.

INTRODUCTION: Commercially available serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 detect antibodies to either the nucleocapsid or spike protein. Here we compare the performance of the Beckman-Coulter SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG assay to that of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG and Roche Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid total antibody assays. In addition, we document the trend in nucleocapsid and spike antibodies in sequential samples collected from convalescent plasma donors. METHODS: Plasma or serum samples from 20 individual SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive inpatients (n = 172), 20 individual convalescent donors with a previous RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 20), were deemed positive SARS-CoV-2 samples. RT-PCR-negative inpatients (n = 24), and 109 pre-SARS-CoV-2 samples were determined to be SARS-CoV-2 negative. Samples were assayed by the Abbott, Roche, and Beckman assays. RESULTS: All three assays demonstrated 100% specificity. Abbott, Beckman, and Roche platforms had sensitivities of 98%, 93%, and 90% respectively, with the difference in sensitivity attributed primarily to samples from immunocompromised patients. After the exclusion of samples immunocompromised patients, all assays exhibited ≥ 95% sensitivity. In sequential samples collected from the same individuals, the Roche nucleocapsid antibody assay demonstrated continually increasing signal intensity, with maximal values observed at the last time point examined. In contrast, the Beckman spike IgG antibody signal peaked between 14 and 28 days post positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and steadily declined in subsequent samples. Subsequent collections 51-200 days (median of 139 days) post positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR from five inpatients and five convalescent donors revealed that spike and nucleocapsid antibodies remained detectable for several months after confirmed infection. CONCLUSIONS: The three assays are sensitive and specific for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Nucleocapsid and spike antibodies were detectable for up to 200 days post-positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR but demonstrated markedly different trends in signal intensity.

Comparison of Two Automated Immunoassays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel member of the coronavirus family that caused the global coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The prevalence remains largely unknown because of early testing supply shortages. Although it cannot currently be used to determine level of immunity, antibody testing can contribute to epidemiological studies, identify convalescent plasma donors, or satisfy curiosity about previous exposure to the virus. METHODS: 407 samples collected from hospitalized inpatients with and without a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 170 remnant clinical specimens collected and frozen prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, and paired serum and plasma samples from 23 convalescent plasma donors were used to determine performance characteristics of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays. The sensitivity, specificity, imprecision, interferences, and sample stability were determined. These assays were then used to characterize the antibody response in serial samples from 20 SARS-CoV-2 positive inpatients. RESULTS: Both assays exhibited 100% specificity (95% CI; 99.05-100.00), giving no positive results in 170 specimens collected before July 2019 and 215 specimens from patients without a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Differences between platforms were most notable in SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. Roche offered higher sensitivity in convalescent plasma donors at 95.7% (95% CI; 78.1-99.9) versus 91.3% (95% CI; 72.0-98.9) but Abbott detected antibodies in 2 immunocompromised patients whereas Roche did not. The Roche and Abbott platforms also exhibited different trends in antibody signal for a subset of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both the Abbott and Roche platforms offer excellent specificity but different trends in antibody signal may reflect qualitative differences in the types of antibodies recognized by the 2 assays. Negative serologic results do not exclude previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.